How do coaches affect athletes

I have had the privilege of having some great coaches in my life that have impacted my life far beyond what one could measure. Coaches, we need to understand that we must develop student athletes and prepare them with a college education so that too can be professionals-even if they do not become professional athletes.

I challenge every coach, whether it is a little league coach, high school coach, college coach or professional coach, to select a youth and mentor, guide and supervise this child. The manifestation of their growth will be Blessing to your life and will extend your career far beyond the realms of possibilities because behind every successful player is a magnificent coach.

Coaches stand up, continue to reach back, give back and help push our student athletes forward. Coaches are the deal breakers. It is up to you as a coach.

Choose to be a dream-maker and not a dream-breaker. Skip to content. Coaches have psychological impact on players. Related posts. Coaches Corner: Apply the classroom to practice May 3, Coaches Corner: Journal your experiences October 13, The fundamental goal concept: The path to process and performance success.

Horn Ed. Advances in sport psychology 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Campbell, B. International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: protein and exercise. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 4, 8.

Case, R. A study to examine the job competencies of sport facility managers. International Sports Journal, 7 2 , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sports-related injuries among high school athletes: United States, school year.

Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 55 38 , Clover, J. Dieffenbach, K. Olympic Coach, 12 2 , DiFiori, J. Overuse injuries in youth athletes: An Overview.

Athletic Therapy Today, 7 6 , Dougherty, N. Management principles in sport and leisure services. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess Publishing. Fuller, C. The application of risk management in sport. Sports Medicine, 34 6 , Goldstein, E. International society of sports nutrition position stand: caffeine and performance.

Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 7 1 , 5. Johnson, S. The effects of group versus individual goal setting on bowling performance. The Sport Psychologist, 11, Kerksick, C. International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: nutrient timing.

Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 5, Kreider, R. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 7, 7.

Leonard, R. The administrative side of coaching: Applying business concepts to athletic program administration and coaching 2nd ed. Locke, E. The application of goal setting to sports. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, A theory of goal setting and task performance. Building practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, New directions in goal setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, Has goal setting gone wild, or have its attackers abandoned good scholarship?

Goal setting and task performance: Psychological Bulletin, 90, Mahoe, S. Five ways to improve communication with your players. Mensch, J. Crews, C. Competing perspectives during organizational socialization on the role of certified athletic trainers in high school settings. Journal of Athletic Training, 40 4 , Miller, M. Emergency Response Management for Athletic Trainers.

Mueller, F. National Council of Youth Sports. Report on trends and participation in organized youth sports. Podlog, L. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 18, Ryska, T. Participation motives in predicting sport dropout among Australian youth gymnasts. North American Journal of Psychology, 4 2 , Sage, G. Introduction to motor behavior: A neurophysiological approach 2nd ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Silva III, J. Psychological foundations of sport. Smith, A. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 6, 5.

Sullivan, P. Communication skills training for interactive sports. The Sport Psychologist, 7, Torre, J. New York, NY: Hyperion. Department of Agriculture. Department of Health and Human Services.

Johnson, Ed. All contributing authors are residential faculty members at the United States Sports Academy. Previous Next. Scott R. Johnson, Pamela J. Wojnar, William J. Price, Timothy J. Foley, Jordan R. Moon, Enrico N. Esposito, and Fred J. Share this:.

Go to Top. In terms of item distributional assumptions the levels of Skewness Descriptive statistics for perceived coach controlling style, controlled motivation, and competitive anxiety are presented in Table 1. The CFA was based on 30 indicators and 5 latent constructs.

As exposed above, we tested the less parsimonious partial mediation model in first place, computing both the structural and the measurement model simultaneously.

Successively, we tested the complete mediation model, by which the direct paths from Controlling Style to Competitive Anxiety were deleted. Finally, we tested the direct effects model by which the mediated paths were deleted. Considering that both partial mediation model and direct effects model showed excellent fit indices, we opted to select partial mediation model as the preferred model as it better fits the theoretical framework better.

An additional analysis of the indirect effects of the partial mediation model was conducted in order to test the relative contribution of controlled motivation to the mediation of coach controlling style on competitive anxiety factors Table 3 showing very low indirect effects of controlled motivation on somatic anxiety, worry, and concentration disruption. TABLE 2.

Fit statistics and standardized coefficient estimates for structural models. TABLE 3. Standardized total and indirect effects for the partial mediation model. When considered as an exclusive predictor variable, this coach interpersonal style significantly predicted the occurrence of Somatic Anxiety, Worry, and Concentration Disruption. This result concurs with previous research in the field of coach interpersonal style on the perceived ill-being of athletes Isoard et al.

Despite this low indirect effects, the partial mediation model revealed the best fit indices giving support to the hypothesized model. These results suggest that, as raised by Bartholomew et al. Our results, based on a significant sample of young athletes, offer a general picture on how this relation may be.

On the other hand, this motivational climate based on the use of external rewards and controlling feedback could switch the goals of the athletes from more intrinsically to more externally regulated, and in the long term, lead to external burdens and anxious symptoms toward competition.

Analyzing the three factors of SAS-2 individually, significant direct effects of controlling style on somatic anxiety, worry, and concentration disruption were found.

These results suggest that, when athletes feel pressured and thwarted by an authoritarian coach, they are most likely to display somatic signs of anxiety before and during competition.

Additionally, as controlling coaches may deny attention and affection when desired behaviors are not displayed by their subordinates Assor et al. Finally, negative or pressuring rapport developed by coaches seems to difficult athletes to focus on relevant cues of the game, as some authors have previously suggested Baker et al.

Consequently, we aimed to evaluate not only direct effects of coach controlling style on competitive anxiety, but also if an indirect path, mediated by controlled motivation would better predict this relationship. Our results indicate that this mediated path also predicted somatic anxiety and concentration disruption, however, this mediated effects seem to be weak.

Additionally, no significant mediated effect was found on the worry form of competitive anxiety. The dissimilar functioning of the worry subscale in comparison with somatic anxiety and concentration disruption is not new. From a descriptive point of view, athletes have systematically reported higher scores on worry than on the other two subscales of the SAS-2, no matter the age of the participants e.

Besides, this factor has shown different correlation patterns with external variables e. Previous studies have discussed on this differential psychometric functioning of the worry subscale, that might be describing a basal level of anxiety by which athletes report, not an anticipation of potential negative consequences, but a degree of appraisal of the personal importance and perceived responsibility regarding the task at hand e.

Although this research has confirmed significant predictions on competitive anxiety, as the design of the study is cross-sectional, the results should be taken with caution. In that sense, to assume any causal conclusions seems overstated. However, we believe that our study draws interesting interpretations on how social agents in sport might influence the emotional experience of young sport participants besides modeling their type of motivation.

Further studies should complement these environmental antecedents with other dispositional variables related to the cognitive appraisal of the competition Martinent and Ferrand, , including for instance perfectionism Appleton and Hill, , or coping strategies Dias et al.

The partial mediation model proved to have the best fit to the data when compared to the complete mediation model and the direct effects model. However, the forms of somatic anxiety and concentration disruption, but specially the worrying of young athletes, seem to be better predicted by the direct effects of coach controlling style than by the mediated path of controlled motivation, suggesting that more research is needed to understand the relationship between this factors and its motivational antecedents.

Beyond this theoretical debate, practical implications of this study delve on the importance of educating youth sport coaches to develop more autonomy-supportive climates. Autonomy support, unlike controlling style, not only generates well-being outcomes on young athletes, but also prevents undesired outcomes such as forms of trait competitive anxiety.

MT has participated in the design of the research, defined the rationale of the study and collaborated in the consistency of the objectives along the manuscript. CV has selected and guided the methodology process and the adequate data analytic strategy. JC is responsible of the projects in which this study is integrated and he has collaborated in the definition of the rationale of the study. All authors have collaborated in the writing of the different sections and proofread its final version.

This funding body did not participate in any of the phases of the research. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Alcaraz, S. Sport 86, — Sports Sci. American Psychological Association Available at: www. Amorose, A. Autonomy-supportive coaching and self-determined motivation in high school and college athletes: a test of self-determination theory.

Sport Exerc. Appleton, P. Perfectionism and athlete burnout in junior elite athletes: the mediating role of motivation regulations.

Sport Psychol. Assor, A. Baker, J.